Search for: "Pass et al v. Government Employees Insurance Company et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
What is directly at stake in the new case of Black, et al., v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am
Key Findings In December 2017, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), arguably the most significant piece of tax legislation in three decades. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:54 pm
This bill began as AB 2757, which failed to pass the house of origin in June. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
”) Basically, any person who is aware of false or fraudulent conduct can qualify to bring suit.[12] Typically, this is a current or former employee of an organization or corporation such as a medical practice, nursing home, hospital, clinical laboratory, health insurance company, durable medical equipment company and drug and medical device manufacturers and distributors. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 3:31 pm
Jul. 3, 2009)(Brister) (INSURANCE LAW: appraisal clause in insurance context, hail damage to home of insured property owner) STATE FARM LLOYDS v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
The release prescribes granular disclosures, which seem designed to better meet the needs of would-be hackers rather than investors’ need for financially material information.[8] The new rule, for example, requires disclosure of detailed information about issuers’ cyber risk management processes and governance and relevant personnel.[9] Second, the SEC’s potentially non-material risk management and governance disclosures veer into managing… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm
There were similarities between the plaintiff and other employees of the company for which the plaintiff worked and the similarities precluded anyone from clearly saying that the plaintiff was the person shown in the tape. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:47 pm
Warshak, et al., --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 5071766 (6th Cir. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
THE DISCLOSURE LANDSCAPE To understand the disclosure landscape, it is helpful to first review the statutes that govern company filings, and the SEC rules that mandate the disclosure of material risks. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm
A derivative action is a means for shareholders to seek redress for wrongs committed against the company and to benefit indirectly from the overall improvement in the company’s future governance, which the derivative action hopefully instigates. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
George v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
At least eight other states—Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, South Dakota—are also considering fair access bills, some of which would apply to payment processors, payment networks, and credit card companies and networks in addition to banks and insurers. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, 138 S. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK… [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
Furthermore, their suggestion that Gauley Bridge fits into their Marxist paradigm of corporate corruption of science (citing similar works by Michaels, Castleman, Rosner, et al.) ignores the robust debate from all sectors of society, including the scientific community, organized labor, political actors, industry, government, and academia. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
-based firms (including subsidiaries) with at least $500 million in annual revenues would likely qualify as “doing business” in California.[17] (Insurance companies, which are covered by other separate legislation in California, are excluded.) [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
But their hard work and not inconsiderable investment will be snuffed out if the pending food safety bill is passed by the Senate. [read post]
