Search for: "Paul Horwitz"
Results 281 - 300
of 483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2011, 1:30 pm
The stories of 17 of the Court's most interesting and important free-speech and religious-freedom cases and controversies -- from the Sedition Act to the Ten Commandments and football-prayer and lots of ones in between -- are explored in depth by a diverse group of First Amendment scholars, including Prawfs' own Paul Horwitz and guest-blogger Scott Moss. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:34 pm
Orin referenced posts by Eric Muller, Paul Horwitz, and Jack Balkin. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:05 pm
Ambro & Paul J. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:21 pm
Ambro & Paul J. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
[The Cockle Bur]* Professor Paul Horwitz has a response to Governor Rick Perry’s “Response” — and Horwitz seems somewhat sympathetic. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
University of Alabama School of Law professor Paul Horwitz, writing on the PrawfsBlawg, said the brochures have useful information on recent faculty hires, scholarly publications and other innovations. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 7:16 am
From Paul Horwitz at PrawfsBlawg, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi: "Bigger Than Jesus" Via Dan Ernst at Legal History Blog, from the University of North Carolina Press, Catherine Fisk's new book, Working Knowledge: Employee Innovation and the Rise of Corporate Intellectual Property, 1800-1930. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:53 pm
I ask because the thought crossed my mind while reading a draft of a book manuscript by our own Paul Horwitz last night. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:03 pm
[National Law Journal] * And here’s commentary on Karen Sloan’s NLJ piece by Professor Paul Horwitz. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 12:52 pm
Compare Greenfield and Campos with Paul Horwitz’s most recent posts. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 3:22 am
Horwitz's description is more nuanced and, in reality, more accurate. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:17 am
Randy Barnett and Josh Blackman: yes, the confirmation process had gone wrong, but not necessarily in the way we’re told [National Affairs] A case against judicial restraint [Ilya Shapiro, same, related Cato] “Business and the Roberts Court without Scalia” [Jonathan Adler, related on supposed “pro-business” Court] SCOTUS should (again) step in to reject Obama end-run around advice/consent on appointment power [Ilya Shapiro and Thomas Berry, Cato] The… [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:46 pm
But I figured some folks might find it interesting nonetheless.Hat tip: Kim Krawiec.UPDATE: Paul Horwitz has some very good thoughts on this over at Prawfs. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 2:12 am
REV. 965 Three Faces of Deference Paul Horwitz, 83 NOTRE DAME L. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
See this recent Prawfs post by Paul Horwitz. [read post]
21 May 2014, 9:05 pm
Bainbridge] ABA moves forward with law school accreditation changes; tenure, among other institutions, likely to remain sacrosanct [Caron/TaxProf, Fortune] Paul Horwitz reviews James R. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Johnson, Counter-Narrative in Corporate Law: Saints and Sinners, Apostles and Epistles, (Michigan State Law Review, Forthcoming).Dana Brakman Reiser, Charity Law's Essentials, (Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 167, Sept. 28, 2009).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Nehaluddin Ahmad, The Modern Concept of Secularism and Islamic Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis, 15 Annual Survey Of International & Comparative Law 75-105 (2009).Paul Horwitz, Demographics and… [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 6:55 am
More: Paul Horwitz. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 6:25 am
., pp. 193-226, (Vita e Pensiero, pp. 193-226, 2008).Christine Chambers Goodman, Beneath the Veil: Corollaries on Diversity and Critical Mass Scholarships from Rawls' Original Position on Justice, (Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2007.)Paul Horwitz, Churches as First Amendment Institutions: Of Sovereignty and Spheres, (Harvard Civil Rights- Civil Liberties Law Review, Forthcoming.)From SmartCILP:Jose A. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 5:11 am
[Point of Law; Silver @ Bizarro-Overlawyered] Professor Paul Horwitz questions the convenience of the death-bed statements of the decedent in Williams v. [read post]
