Search for: "Paulsen v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2009, 3:37 am
How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 6:18 am
The threats to impeach 4 Iowa Supreme Court justices for their same-sex marriage decision (Varnum v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 8:04 am
The book I joined — “The Constitution of the United States,” by Michael Stokes Paulsen, Steven Calabresi, Michael McConnell and Samuel Bray — had already been through two editions. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm
As the Founding-era Supreme Court held in McCulloch v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:34 am
United States (1983); Employment Division v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:34 am
United States (1983); Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm
Indeed, Brandenburg v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 11:56 pm
” In re Paulsen, 30 F.3d 1475, 1480 (Fed. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
The authors are two highly conservative, leading legal scholars, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The proposed lines dividing each of the six new states are provisional; under Draper’s proposal, over the next few years, any county that adjoins any of the proposed states can choose to become part of that contiguous state, provided that the counties that are provisionally in that neighboring state also agree to add such a county. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-356 Title: Paulsen v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
See, e.g., Stencil v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Worst Constitutional Decision of All Time, 78 Notre Dame L. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:43 am
And the absence of deference on the Article III question is bolstered by the Supreme Court's far-more-formalistic approach to departures from Article III, as typified by Chief Justice Roberts's opinion for the majority in Stern v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:33 am
” At NPR, Nina Totenberg reports that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
