Search for: "Peak v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2009, 1:47 am
As the Supreme Court oral argument in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Grant was rendering an opinion as an expertwitness, not stating a fact as a fact witness. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:45 am by Sarah Johnson Phillips
From my colleague, Andrew Moratzka: On June 7th, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion in Illinois Commerce Commission, et al., v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:22 am
The second half of the 20th century saw a surge of hope after World War II that reached its peak in 1960 with California's famed "master plan. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
[S]peaking common pro-life views as part of a pregnancy help ministry, or failing to speak the State’s pro-abortion views on hotly disputed issues, is illegal under state law, on pain of crippling fines, injunctions,  and attorney fees. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Dillon v Peak Envtl., LLC  2019 NY Slip Op 04548  Decided on June 7, 2019  Appellate Division, Fourth Department is the story of an upstate commercial case which went through a lot of procedural wrangling, up to the Appellate Division, with little forward movement. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:08 am by skelly
Harvey is the wettest tropical cyclone on record in the United States with peak accumulations of 64.58 inches. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
He states that the filters which the OCME sets for the software program affect how the peaks appear on the electropherogram. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:55 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Moore v R [2011] EWCA Crim 1988 (11 August 2011) Burton v R [2011] EWCA Crim 1990 (11 August 2011) Hookway & Anor v R [2011] EWCA Crim 1989 (11 August 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hirose Electrical UK Ltd v Peak Ingredients Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 987 (11 August 2011) PR (Sri Lanka) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 2) [2011] EWCA Civ 988 (11 August 2011) High… [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:28 pm by WIMS
The EPA responds that using ACTIFLO to process peak wet weather flows diverts water from biological secondary treatment units, and therefore subjecting its use to a no-feasible-alternatives analysis comports with the plain language of the bypass rule. [read post]