Search for: "Pelham v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Guest Post] 21 and illegal in all states? The German Pelham court confirms when sampling is illegal
5 May 2020, 1:20 am
Here's what he has to say on Pelham:Norwegian RectangleAlan HuiTwo decades into the Pelham v Hütter saga, the German Federal Court of Justice has confirmed when sampling is illegal under German copyright law. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:19 am
State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:39 am
Limitations on sick leaveEconomico v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
An employer may seek summary judgment in human rights action by offering a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason rebutting allegations of unlawful discrimination Tibbetts v Pelham Union Free School Dist., 2016 NY Slip Op 06699, Appellate Division, Second Department§296(1)(a) of the New York State Human Rights Law provides that "[i]t shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice . . . [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:46 pm
In this toxic tort litigation concerning the Pelham Bay landfill, we hold that the reports and findings of the expert epidemiologists and toxicologists satisfy the standard employed in Frye v United States, that of general acceptance in the scientific community. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
On a previous appeal, affirming the denial of defendants' motions to dismiss, inter alia, for failure to state a cause of action, we determined that plaintiffs' expert evidence did not require that a hearing be held in accordance with Frye v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
The study analyzed all types of leukemia in the Pelham Bay area, as reported to the New York State Cancer Registry from 1974 to 1985. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:08 am
Documents only available through HTM links, not as PDFs. 3:00pm Thursday, March 15, 2012 20120112 North Dakota State Board of Higher Education, Petitioner v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 6:42 am
The Supreme Court of Appeal, in Pelham Stephanus Bothma and Others v Tertius Bothma N.O and Another (Case number 748/2019) [2021] ZASCA 46 (15 April 2021), re-affirmed the position regarding the interpretation of legal documents, re-stating the principle that only admissible evidence of context, conservatively applied, may be led in resolving an interpretation dispute. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
** See Sheeran v New York State Dept. of Transp. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Although I prefer to write about reported appellate opinions, the state trial court opinion in Carden v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:20 pm
In the morning of October 27, 2005, Mary Colon, then 49 years old, escorted her elderly neighbor to an eye doctor's appointment at 1101 Pelham Parkway North in the Bronx. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
As the Court of Appeals stated in People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:15 am
Matter of Tracy Wolak v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller This Article 78 proceeding was brought about to review a determination of the Comptroller denying petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 5:27 am
In Sebhat v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 5:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
"Citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120 [overruled on other grounds, Matter of Prue v Hunt, 78 NY2d 364], the Appellate Division considered the allegation that the employee's termination was in contravention of his rights under a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:14 pm
State v. [read post]
