Search for: "Pelham v. United States"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
On a previous appeal, affirming the denial of defendants' motions to dismiss, inter alia, for failure to state a cause of action, we determined that plaintiffs' expert evidence did not require that a hearing be held in accordance with Frye v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United State provides as follows: §3. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United State provides as follows: §3. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:46 pm
In this toxic tort litigation concerning the Pelham Bay landfill, we hold that the reports and findings of the expert epidemiologists and toxicologists satisfy the standard employed in Frye v United States, that of general acceptance in the scientific community. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
The study analyzed all types of leukemia in the Pelham Bay area, as reported to the New York State Cancer Registry from 1974 to 1985. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 5:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
As the Court of Appeals stated in People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm
Neugebauer stated that the superiority of this type of proximity analysis was well-established. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:03 am
United States Fire Ins. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:15 am
Matter of Tracy Wolak v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller This Article 78 proceeding was brought about to review a determination of the Comptroller denying petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
"Citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120 [overruled on other grounds, Matter of Prue v Hunt, 78 NY2d 364], the Appellate Division considered the allegation that the employee's termination was in contravention of his rights under a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am
| US Supreme Court rules Official Georgia Codes Annotated is ineligible for copyright protection - Georgia v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am
From 1968 to 1971, he served in the United States Army, including a tour in Vietnam. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:37 pm
Ltd & Rhodia Operations S.A.S. v Neo Chemicals and Oxides Limited & Neo Performance Materials Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 2:09 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
Although it has been admitted by the NIKE legal representatives that Kawhi Leonard had submitted a design, they have gone on to state that it is a false claim that the design was the “Claw” design, as reported in the Bulletin. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
