Search for: "Pena v. Justice"
Results 81 - 100
of 166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2013, 8:33 pm
Holder with Fisher v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From last week's California Court of Appeal decision in Cusi v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:56 am
Earlier this month, in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
Healey (whether “assault weapons” and “large capacity feeding devices” can be banned), Pena v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:20 pm
Yet, I still have some difficulty reconciling the Chief Justice's opinions in Allen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
The first is Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:28 am
Pena v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm
Under the standard set forth by the US Supreme Court in Adarand Constructors Inc v Pena (65 EPD ¶43,366 (1995)), to survive constitutional review, a government entity’s consideration of race has to meet strict scrutiny standards; thus, it must: (1) serve a compelling state interest; and (2) be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am
(relisted after the May 1 conference) Pena v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
" Mooppan cited Pena–Rodriguez v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Bollinger and Gratz v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
” At Knowledge Center, Lisa Soronen looks at the potential impact of Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
The second was in the case of Pena v Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust ([2011] EWHC 3027 (QB)) in which Eady J struck [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:49 am
The Florida Supreme Court ruling in Valle v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am
Under the standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Adarand Constructors Inc v Pena, to survive constitutional review, a government entity’s consideration of race has to meet strict scrutiny standards; thus, it must: (1) serve a compelling state interest; and (2) be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
”Coverage of Monday’s grant of review in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
(relisted after the May 1, May 15, May 21 and May 28 conferences) Pena v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Ford, 18-6819, Issues: (1) Whether Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
