Search for: "Penn Central Transportation Co., in the Matter of"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2010, 8:40 am
Foy and New York Central Mutual Insurance Company Matter of Homan v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am
Penn Central has been heavily criticized over the years. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The first non-per se approach to regulatory takings is the factored analysis in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The first non-per se approach to regulatory takings is the factored analysis in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:52 pm
For legislative conditions, Nashville says, we should turn to the deferential “balancing” test that the Court adopted to assess zoning restrictions in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Penn Central Transportation Co. v City of New York. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Instead, using the test devised in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:07 pm
For legislative conditions, Nashville says, we should turn to the deferential “balancing” test that the Court adopted to assess zoning restrictions in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
This case asks whether two legally distinct but commonly owned contiguous parcels can be combined for regulatory takings analysis under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:39 am
In Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:46 am
(Embassy of the People's Republic of China in Camnada, CPC to hold key session on rule of law, July 30, 2014)This post includes the transcript of a conversation with Keren Wang, a PhD candidate at Penn State (Communication Arts and Sciences, School of Liberal Arts) and my co-author, about the recent strong movement at the highest levels of the Chinese Communist Party toward the institutionalization of rule of law systems with Chinese characteristics, including the petitioning… [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
The developer now urges the court to revisit its open-ended test for assessing regulatory takings under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
After the trial, the jury decided that there was an unconstitutional regulatory taking of the plaintiff’s property pursuant to Lucas and Penn Central. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Co., 2020 Cal. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm
Superior Court (Plotkin) 194 Cal.App.4th 210 Two and a half months after the Third District filed its decision in the Cobb matter, the appellate courts’ Second District published its own opinion on inverse condemnation on April 12, 2011. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Murr implicates the Court’s regulatory takings jurisprudence, and asks whether Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
In a dissent from denial of cert. that wound up just one vote short, Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, urged that “nothing in our precedents clearly establishes the[] admissibility [of such recantations] as a matter of federal constitutional law. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
At issue was whether the district court erred in using the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
