Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Hart" Results 1 - 20 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2010, 1:15 pm by Beck, et al.
E.D.Pa. 2009) ("the Third Circuit's prediction as to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's adopting the Restatement Third simply did not hold true" therefore Berrier "is invalid") (Hart, Mag. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) No, said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Wednesday in Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
In honor of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's recent grant of an appeal on the Restatement (Second)/Restatement (Third) in Tincher v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Pa.2009 Hart, M.J.)But see: Thompson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
The defense’s uniform success in obtaining apportionment charges in Pennsylvania law diversity cases ended with Borman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm by Tobias Lutzi
The volume on The Common Law Jurisprudence of the Conflict of Laws, edited by Sarah McKibbin (University of Southern Queensland) and Anthony Kennedy (Serle Court), recently published by Hart, does just that, by discussing cases like Vita Food Products, Brook v Brook, Bonython v Commonwealth of Australia, AG v Heinemann Publishers (better known as the Australian Spycatcher case), Bremen v Zapata, Vizcaya v Picard, and Kuwait Airways (Nos 4 and 5).… [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:33 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
Horvitz Professor of Law, Harvard Law SchoolOct. 9 Risa Goluboff, John Allan Love Professor of Law and Professor of History, University of Virginia, “People out of Place: The Sixties, the Supreme Court, and Vagrancy Law”Comment: Lisa McGirr, Professor of History, Department of History, Harvard UniversityOct 16: Serena Mayeri, Professor of Law and History, University of Pennsylvania, “Status of Marriage: Marital Supremacy Challenged and Remade, 1960-2000”Comment:… [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Finchett-Maddock & Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, To Open Up: A performative rewriting of Pendragon v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR CD 179 , (Helen Dancer, Bonnie Holligan and Helena Howe (eds.) [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 38147 (ED KY, March 26, 2015), a Kentucky federal district court dismissed a Jewish inmate's complaint that his use of tefillin was restricted while he was in the prison's special housing unit.In Hart v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:02 am
Hart granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff on two claims: a federal Lanham Act claim of “false endorsement” and a Pennsylvania state law claim of “unauthorized use of name or likeness. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
Focusing on Hart’s virtual image alone, the court acknowledged that a virtual player bore resemblance to Hart and was designed with Hart’s physical attributes, sports statistics, and biographical information in mind. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 10:27 am by Howard Friedman
Rickless, Maimon Schwarzschild, William Voegeli, Larry Alexander, 54 San Diego Law Review 197-341 (2017).Gerard V. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Burset, Notre Dame Law School, have updated their paper on Entick v. [read post]