Search for: "People v. Mazzone"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
There's simply no reason at all to think that the 2017 Congress believed that anyone (no reasonable person, anyway) would purchase unwanted insurance because of a "sense of legal obligation" engendered by the 2017 statutory amendment.But even if there were some such unreasonable people out there (such as, perhaps, the individual plaintiffs in the case) who mistakenly read the amended Section 5000A to require them to purchase insurance, those… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:54 am
Jason Mazzone asserts that the Ninth Circuit's decision yesterday in Perry v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:56 am
Morrison, Morrison v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:41 am
Writing at Balkinization, Jason Mazzone notes that the Westboro Baptist Church, infamous for picketing funerals for a variety of bizarre and hateful reasons, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 1:16 pm
Jason Mazzone at Balkinization links to an amicus brief filed by Westboro Baptist Church (of "God hates [everyone but us]" and Snyder v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Jason Mazzone is the Albert E. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” The challengers in California v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 11:13 am
Jason Mazzone). [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Maryland, Martin v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In two of my last three Verdict columns (this one and then this one co-authored with Jason Mazzone), I have discussed—in connection with the Supreme Court’s consideration in Trump v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Rodgers v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
And, for that matter, if the Republicans controlled the Senate, and Ted Cruz were President pro tem, would not some people be skeptical about his presiding over Trump’s trial, given the very real possibility that he, like Democrats, could be a Trump rival for the White House in 2024 if Trump is not disqualified after an impeachment conviction? [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
University of Texas and its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
