Search for: "People ex rel. Lopez v People"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
” (Garner, Dict. of Legal Usage (3d ed. 2011) p. 883; see also People ex rel. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 3:14 pm
People, ex rel. [read post]
30 May 2011, 6:11 am
State ex rel. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
Many people never realize when their rights are violated, for example, and many people do not have the knowledge or skills to begin to pursue a case to protect their rights. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
Congress called it a penalty, but it is relatively low for most people and lacks enhancements for going without insurance intentionally or repeatedly. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
’ Lopez v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
Wiseman Jr. said his decision to toss the case was supported by the plain language of the FCA, 31 U.S.C. 3729, and by case law, including United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:53 am
Aff. (1694) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 People ex rel. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Businesses whose employees are the targets of violent stalkers or jealous exes, or perhaps even the targets themselves, g., Rojas v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
State ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
Minnesota ex rel. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
Minnesota ex rel. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
MPP was initially negotiated and agreed to by the Trump administration and then-incoming Mexican President Lopez Obrador’s administration in November 2018, and the program was first implemented in January 2019. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:05 pm
See Davis ex rel. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
They are also considered separate offenses for purposes of sentencing and of challenges under the Constitution’s ex post facto and double jeopardy clauses. [read post]
