Search for: "People v Bah" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
Bah v The United Kingdom - 56328/07 [2011] ECHR 1448 This is a decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the regulations for eligibility for housing support, after the declaration of incompatibility in Westminster v Morris [2005] EWCA Civ 1184. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
Bah v The United Kingdom - 56328/07 [2011] ECHR 1448 This is a decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the regulations for eligibility for housing support, after the declaration of incompatibility in Westminster v Morris [2005] EWCA Civ 1184. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 10:00 am
Bah allegedly had in his possession at the time of his killing was "lost. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 5:53 am
In the Bábí and Bahá'í faiths, a group of 19 is called a Váhid, a Unity (Arabic: ???? [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
  To those people, we offer the intergalactic version of “Bah, humbug. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 9:42 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITImmigration Law Female Genital Mutilation in Past Does Not, Alone, Rebut Presumption of Threat to Life, Freedom in Future Bah v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am by Ashoka Mukpo
 McDonald tried to plead for instructions from the advancing officers, asking them what they wanted people to do. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit 1978) (government arranged for `mail cover,’ under which postal service provided government agency with information appearing on the face of envelopes or packages addressed to defendant); People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm by Giles Peaker
  The claimants (and Liberty) argued that this should be considered as a ‘modality’ case, as per Bah v United Kingdom (2012) 54 EHRR 21. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am by Orin Kerr
Choate, 576 F2d 165, 174-177 (9th Cir. 1978) (government arranged for “mail cover,” under which postal service provided government agency with information appearing on the face of envelopes or packages addressed to defendant); People v. [read post]