Search for: "People v Boston Scientific Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2014, 5:24 pm by John C. Manoog III
Boston Scientific maintained that is very concerned with patient safety and that it disagreed with the jury’s verdict. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Boston Scientific Corp., and it involves the burden of proof in declaratory judgment actions.) [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 11:12 pm
Other companies named as defendants in suits nationwide include American Medical Systems, Johnson & Johnson, and Boston Scientific Corp. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Boston Scientific Corp., 561 F.3d 1319 (Fed. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Steve Bainbridge
If they were unable to resolve the dispute jointly, the chief executive officer of Boston Scientific was entitled to resolve it unilaterally, provided that if Mann or his successor disagreed with Boston Scientific's decision, Mann could refer the matter to a committee of three independent business people jointly selected by Mann and the Boston Scientific chief executive officer to propose a nonbinding resolution. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:06 pm
Boston Scientific Corp., 631 F.3d 762 (5th Cir. 2011); Stoddard v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 3:01 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBusiness LawCompany Directors' Business Judgment in Refusing Action Cannot Be Challenged Through Derivative Suit In re: Boston Scientific Corp. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
Jan Hughes can proceed with her claim that Boston Scientific Corp. failed to properly warn her about the Hydro ThermAblator's burn risks, the 5th U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:21 pm by Law Lady
Cordis Corp., 20 No. 1 Westlaw Journal Health Law 10, Westlaw Journal Health Law May 24, 2012 Cordis Corp. has filed a notice of appeal in response to a $40 million judgment entered in favor of Boston Scientific Corp. after a Delaware federal judge doubled a jury verdict in a stent design patent dispute. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:17 am by Bexis
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp., 2011 U.S. [read post]