Search for: "People v Castaneda"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
Garland, Castaneda-Martinez v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Consider Castaneda v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
And here's a third example: Castaneda v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:30 pm
In Hamen v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:31 pm
(Id. at p. 671; see also People v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
"The decision is set out below:The People of the State of New York, ex rel. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8058, Castaneda-Morales v. [read post]
6 May 2017, 5:24 am
People have a constitutional right to be left alone. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
Two people answered. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 4:58 pm
Supreme Court held in a 1976 case, Castaneda v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:21 pm
We call those special people urologists. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:51 am
See Flores-Castaneda, 384 Fed. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:51 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:21 am
Diaz-Castaneda, 494 F.3d 1146, 1152 (9th Cir. 2007) (stating, in the context of a passenger inquiry, that “[t]he police may ask people who have legitimately been stopped for identification without conducting a [separate] Fourth Amendment search or seizure”) (citing Hiibel, 542 U.S. at 185); United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am
Castaneda The Second Amendment was not the only issue before the Justices yesterday morning; they also heard argument in Hui v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
Diaz-Castaneda, 494 F.3d 1146, 1152 (9th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S. [read post]
