Search for: "People v Ifill" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2007, 8:21 am
Some notable quotables from the discussion: *"The courts in the era of Thurgood Marshall and Brown v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
Sherrilyn Ifill is the president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., which filed an amicus brief in support of the commission in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:42 pm by Lynda Barack
in which University of Maryland Law professor Sherrilyn Ifill argues that the Court’s decision in Berghuis v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
Listen to the Audio GWEN IFILL: Finally tonight, As the Affordable Health Care Act hangs in the balance, law, politics and the Supreme Court are on a collision course. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 3:42 pm
I submit that of the 3 people on the stage that night, Palin was the one who got it right on that question. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am by SHG
This was reiterated in the Supreme Court’s opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am by SHG
This was reiterated in the Supreme Court’s opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 9:28 am
Had he been on the court, I suspect there would be a lot of changes that I don’t like and the American people wouldn’t like, including everything from Roe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:13 am by Adam Chandler
” At ACSblog, Sherrilyn Ifill looks critically at the disparity in media attention between Snyder v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
Lincoln’s Trident: The West Gulf Blockading Squadron during the Civil War; William Davenport Mercer’s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 2:13 pm
"So the woman who can't name a case other than Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
The Supreme Court Thursday is expected to issue arguably the most anticipated decision since 2000's Bush v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:10 am by Amy Howe
In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks back at last week’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]