Search for: "People v Jefferson" Results 1 - 20 of 822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Eugene Volokh] Columbia, the Boycotting Judges, Neutrals, and Secondary Boycotts
7 May 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Elrod v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Mike Johnson’s Visit to Columbia Ups the Ante in the Right-Wing Attack on Universities
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The right mounted court challenges with mixed results for decades, until this June when the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
[Eugene Volokh] The Bail Project Isn't Liable for Crimes by People It Bailed Out
22 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From Troutt v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] N.C. Court Holds Selective COVID Shutdown May Have Violated State Constitution's "Fruits of Labor" Clause
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am by Eugene Volokh
King v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
10 Fascinating Facts About SCOTUS to Tide Us Over Until the Justices Wreck the Country in June
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
    MARBURY V. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Rediscovering and Realizing the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle, by Kevin Frazier
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
[Jim Lindgren] FAQs re Murthy v. Missouri
14 Mar 2024, 11:16 am by Jim Lindgren
Blum v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Part II – A Response to Professor Jed Shugerman on Slate in 2017, and his most recent 2024 Tweet Thread(s), About The 1793 Hamilton Document!
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Addendum I: A Few Reflections on the Oral Argument
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
  v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Trump Lawyer Reads the Constitution Like a Secret Code Requiring Decryption
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
During last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Supreme Court raises broad questions about Colorado ruling on Trump
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am by Scott Bomboy
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin's Case  and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm by Josh Blackman
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets "Office under the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Ilya Somin] Thoughts on the Supreme Court Oral Argument in the Trump Section 3 Case
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm by Ilya Somin
He also admitted that people at the time feared that a former Confederate such as Jefferson Davis could potentially become president. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Look Away: How the Supreme Court Could Set Aside Trump’s Disqualification for Insurrection under the Fourteenth Amendment
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am by Dean Falvy
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
mistaken calls from nonpurchasers have little weight in real estate TM case
19 Jan 2024, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rampart Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
[John Ross] Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in an IJ case, DeVillier v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
OT2023’s last grants?
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Smith v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/