Search for: "People v Keels"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
The author cites the recent case of Keeling v New Rock Theater Prods as an example of this enhanced sensitivity, but warns that ' [i]f we don’t have a good vocabulary for explaining how meaningful performance is, it should come as no surprise that we don’t even know how to give credit to performers'. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
The law of what people are allowed to do with their drones in the vicinity of other people’s property is undeveloped and the Counterclaim raises reasonable issues in this regard. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
In 1939, an official with the Illinois High School Association, Henry V. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
The ICO has set out how seven of the UK’s political parties need to improve the way they handle people’s personal data after assessing how they manage data protection. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am
Q: On April 21, 2022, the Supreme Court in Cassirer v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:05 am
Subpart F rules in greater detail and goes on to explain the changes introduced by the 2017 tax reform (TCJA).[3] Part V analyzes the different approaches taken to CFC rules in several countries including Japan, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Colombia, the Netherlands, China, and Spain. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:45 am
Here's the complete list of countries to which the Book Depository says it will ship for free: A - Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Aruba, Australia, Austria B - Bahamas, Bahrain, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bermuda, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, British Virgin Islands, Brunei Darrusalam, Bulgaria C - Canada, Cayman Islands, Chile, China, Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Comoros, Cook Islands, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic D - Denmark, Dominica, Dominican… [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
Ruth Fletcher, of the School of Law at Keele University. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:09 am
The Kochs are packing the board in part to force the issue, and are suing to deny that Bill Niskanen’s widow can inherit his shares in part to try to prevent Ed’s shares from passing on to an ally rather than reverting back to the board when he finally keels over. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 9:23 am
He looked up Quirin v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
On 13 August Ofcom had a news piece “Fewer people getting news from social media”. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
His earlier book, American Sovereigns: The People and America's Constitutional Tradition Before the Civil War (2007) demonstrated the continued possession by many Americans of a sense of their sovereign authority. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
Yet, Larry remained even-keeled and effective. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Hitchcock and Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:50 pm
Pieces of the Amount A Puzzle Profit Margin Z Deemed Routine Profit Margin X Deemed Non-Routine Profits Y=Z-X and Y=W+V Deemed Non-Routine Profits Attributable to Markets W Deemed Non-Routine Profits Attributable to Other Factors V If, for example, the deemed routine profit margin (x) is 10 percent, and the share of deemed non-routine profits attributable to markets (w) is also 10 percent, then a company with a 20 percent profit margin (z) could expect that 10 percent of the 10… [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 11:09 am
In a court filing prior to the hearing, Ellis’s legal team had pointed to Georgia Court of Appeals precedent in Kenerly v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 8:51 am
VERRILLI: With Congress, it’s true there have been times in the [United States v.] [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
Box 1698 Jackson, MS 39215 Phone: (601) 987-4872 (V/TTY); (800) 852-8328 (V/TTY/Toll Free in MS) Web: http://www.msprojectstart.org T.K. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am
Over the past couple of years, there has been a great deal of discussion — particularly in relation to the Durham Statement [1] — about technical standards and preservation issues for law reviews that publish openly and exclusively online. [read post]
