Search for: "People v Lackey"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm
That was in Lackey v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:52 pm
One of the ploys that opponents of the death penalty use to try to block it -- given that the American people are solidly against their real position -- is to drag out the appeals process for decades and then claim that it is cruel to keep people on death row for decades.This is called the Lackey claim for Justice Stevens's solo opinion in Lackey v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
Stevens writing for himself and Breyer continued a theme started in his 1995 dissent to Lackey v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
Like the testimony by Judge Lackey yesterday about not being able to go to the Mississippi Attorney General's Office because, he was told, Jim Hood had buckled to pressure from Dickie Scruggs to cooperate in Scruggs' mass Katrina settlement with State Farm that netted the $26.5 million in fees at the core of the Jones v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:32 am
"I of all people would not have anything to do with Steve Patterson," he noted. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:37 am
Texas, No. 15-797, and Buck v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:27 am
I figured there would be a more complete story later, and I was right.This story, by Steve Korris of Legal Newsline, talks about a ruling by Judge Coleman, the new judge in the fee dispute case that led to the alleged plot to bribe Judge Lackey, Jones, Funderburg v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:04 am
March 17 remains the last day for plea bargains in USA v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 8:23 am
People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:14 am
Let's take another look at yesterday's defense motion in USA v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:30 am
Rossmiller also analyzes the underlying Jones v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:57 am
In the context of the current Jones v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:18 am
In my observation, other than the truly and incorrigibly stupid, no group of people is so prone to dumbness as smart people. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:30 am
Supreme Court's disastrous ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 12:14 am
Nationwide appeal, and who had a sharp exchange with William Walker, counsel for the policyholders, during oral argument last year in the Broussard v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:14 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:00 am
"Translation: Only Billionaires and Supreme Court Justices get to do "harmful things because they have the capacity," not anyone else in our Nation's Capital.Editorial Comment: How many times is this lackey to billionaires going to mention "regular people" in one speech? [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 11:48 am
Although there are plenty of instances where Justices are more than willing to share their thoughts on the merits before full briefing and argument; for a recent example, you need look no further than Justice Thomas's most recent installment in his long-running debate with Justices Stevens and Breyer over the merits of so-called Lackey claims in his recent concurrence in the denial of cert in Johnson v. [read post]
