Search for: "People v Mead" Results 21 - 40 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2023, 5:53 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  People's own lived experience and personal perception informs their world-view. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
In Optis v Apple, Meade J explained that the date of hand-down itself is not necessarily confidential. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 8:13 pm by Bill Marler
Norovirus cases were increasing throughout Europe and the Pacific at the same time. [36] One issue with cruise ships is the close contact between people as living quarters are so close, and despite education efforts, there still seems to be a lack of public understanding regarding how the illness is spread. [7, 14] On the other hand, reporting occurs much more quickly in these situations because of the close proximity and concentration of illness, allowing for the quicker detection of… [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:08 pm by Bill Marler
In these cases, people can carry the same viral load as those who do experience symptoms. [read post]
The Court’s approach to confidentiality Meade J began his analysis with a reminder of the key principles identified by the Court of Appeal in OnePlus v Mitsubishi ([2020] EWCA 1562). [read post]