Search for: "People v Pataki"
Results 61 - 76
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2007, 8:07 pm
Pataki, (Docket Nos. 96-6249(L) and 96-6269). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:06 pm
Sing Sing in New York.The place where in People v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:10 am
[11] Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
He would have lost anyway, because Dinkins v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 11:10 am
Pataki, 514 F. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:56 am
Alcott, a partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, stressed that the federal court decision in Lopez Torres v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 8:18 pm
Pataki, (Docket Nos. 96-6249(L) and 96-6269). [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
II. [*3] The Governor has raised a threshold question as to Senator Skelos's standing to sue in light of the stringent criteria for legislator standing that we adopted in Silver v Pataki (96 NY2d 532, 539-540 [2001]). [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:48 am
Part of American Stetll sets out the collapse of an older liberal consensus on the meaning of "separation of church and state," encapsulated in the rhetoric (if not necessarily the result) in Everson v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
(EcuRed, Letra del Año)).The object of the annual letter is to provide guidance for the nation and its people, as well as more technical advice for the orisha communities of initiates and believers. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
But in Duamutef v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm
The patakis for Oshun and Ogun are particularly interesting. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
Pataki, 165 F.Supp. 2d 266, 300 (N.D.N.Y. 2001) (testimony on state’s purchase of tribal land); Denson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
Pataki, 969 F.Supp. 160 (S.D.N.Y. 1997). [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
CCPA’s sales restrictions raise First Amendment concerns In Sorrell v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
There is no longer any defense available for these people. [read post]
