Search for: "People v Profit"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 6:32 am
Many large businesses now take into account the “triple bottom line” – people, planet, profit. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:55 am
Many people use the words “charity” and “non-profit organization” interchangeably. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:58 am
We are expecting a further substantial increase in revenue this coming year, on the back of the ever-increasing business that the firm will be taking on, especially with fewer people getting legal aid. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Samsung v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 11:23 am
However, unknown to them at the time was the fact that these profits were truly other people’s investments. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:44 am
In People of the State of New York v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:04 am
Regina (Camelot UK Lotteries Ltd) v Gambling Commission (People’s Health Trust intervening): [2012] EWHC 2391 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 253 “Societies were not precluded from being ‘non-commercial’ and eligible for the grant of lottery operating licences under section 98 of the Gambling Act 2005, as being established or conducted for the purpose of ‘private gain’ within the meaning of section 19 of the 2005 Act, on account of the… [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 pm
In Dobson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 7:47 am
Over at my Legal Blog Watch Beat, I posted about the Walmart v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 9:55 am
More recently, the 2018 case of Salazar v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:18 am
The court reached this decision in the case of Tyler v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:42 pm
Related Cases: A.B.O Comix, et al. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
SMUG v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
An economic framework based on profit maximization often assumes that profits are owed primarily to the owners of capital. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
Kevin Thomson is a plaintiff in Thompson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:15 pm
This makes total sense.Just because your marijuana collective is huge -- here, 1600 people -- doesn't mean that it's not a legitimate collective. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Eternal Word Television Network, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm
In the (in)famous 1830 case of State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:03 pm
Counsel faced an active bench yesterday when they presented arguments in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v Fossil, Inc. [read post]
