Search for: "People v Roberts"
Results 41 - 60
of 7,528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2021, 4:41 am
Windsor and Obergefell v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
” To justify that anti-historical and non-textual principle, Roberts relied on some bizarre statements he made in a previous case, Northwest Austin v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:39 pm
In his dissent in yesterday's Boumediene v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
Robert Buttery, 2018-0183. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 6:19 am
. 'Robert Livingston . . . endorsed this same fundamental principle: "The people are the best judges who ought to represent them. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:27 pm
Roberts's misreading of Marbury is a rehash of Cooper v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:11 am
The result in Snyder v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Heller and continued in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:27 am
People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
I often asked people who knew Roberts in his younger years about setbacks he might have experienced. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:06 am
(For seven months, he tried to move the deciding justices on Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
Perhaps the most egregiously political deviation from precedent since Bush v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:16 am
United Haulers v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:56 am
Ford and Panetti say incompetent people can’t be executed. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:54 am
See eg., Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 1:50 am
Here is the gist: Has Roe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:06 am
”] The first sentence is quote from Withrow v Larkin, and thus it could be seen as Roberts relying on precedent. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
Colorado, Timbs v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:43 pm
Commentators have treated the Court’s decision in Whitford v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
”Obergefell v. [read post]
