Search for: "People v. Blinks" Results 1 - 20 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm
A “blink of an eye” or “fraction of a second” was enough time; “A cold, calculated choice can be arrived at quickly. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 1:20 pm
  Needless to say, the picture of the defendant make him look bad -- it was his booking photo, which caught him mid-blink, so he looked weird and/or intoxicated -- and the picture of the victim made her look awesome (taken at a picnic or the like, with figurative rainbows and unicorns). [read post]
24 May 2022, 1:54 pm by Justin Chan
Because the Court’s emphasis on finality blinks this reality, it exacerbates the intolerable risk of innocent people languishing in prison and even being executed. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:50 am
Summary Opinion 2007-40 (13 March 2007)), illustrates why tax law sometimes makes people blink and throw up their hands in disgust.A bit of background. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:44 pm
”Mr Justice Floyd was not, however, of the opinion that the skilled person would find themselves drawn to this literal construction:[46] “…The patent is intended to be a practical document addressed to technical people in industry. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:01 am by Dale Carpenter
[Almost a century ago, just as the modern First Amendment was born, a little-known gay-rights organization in Chicago emerged from its closet blinking into the daylight] In commemoration of the 100th anniversary of Schenck v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:21 pm
And indeed many restrictions focus on particular places — sidewalks outside people’s homes (Frisby v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:36 am by by PritzkerLaw
It is particularly dangerous for young children, people with compromised immune systems and the elderly. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 5:53 pm
It's a game of constitutional chicken and the first one to blink is the first justice that abandons their judicial philosophy and admits to being result oriented.Who will blink first? [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 9:55 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Tinker v. [read post]