Search for: "People v. Brown (1990)" Results 81 - 100 of 269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  As social creatures, they are subject to the same pushes and pulls of social psychology that explain most people. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am by Tinker Ready
“How many cases of innocent people being wrongly convicted have to occur before people realize that there’s a very broad spectrum of forensic science? [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
  Impose duty to monitor the markets they make; compliance of users, the quality and conduct of the people and businesses that use the platform. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Brown, 102 P. 459, 461 (Kan. 1909) (also holding unconstitutional a state statute obligating employers to provide written explanation for dismissal of employees); St. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Brown, 102 P. 459, 461 (Kan. 1909) (also holding unconstitutional a state statute obligating employers to provide written explanation for dismissal of employees); St. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am by Anthony Gaughan
And in 1990 David Souter refused to state his position on Roe v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
The year before Harlan’s nomination the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Eric Goldman
(Justice Kruger, the concurring judge and wild-card in this case, was also appointed by Brown). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
It is helpful to start with the dissenting reasons of Justices Côté[xi] and Brown in LSBC v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am by Anthony Gaughan
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 In Henry v Cash Biz the Supremes had another chance to demonstrate their commitment to denying people harmed by shady business practices from getting any relief from the State’s judicial system; they embraced that opportunity wholeheartedly as much as coldheartedly, with not a single member of the court writing in dissent. [read post]