Search for: "People v. Brown (1992)" Results 21 - 40 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
Brown would write the majority opinion in Plessy v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Brown, 102 P. 459, 461 (Kan. 1909) (also holding unconstitutional a state statute obligating employers to provide written explanation for dismissal of employees); St. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Brown, 102 P. 459, 461 (Kan. 1909) (also holding unconstitutional a state statute obligating employers to provide written explanation for dismissal of employees); St. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Changing judge changes law.Between 1973 and 1992, pursuant to Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
See, e.g., Brown Bag Software, 960 F.2d at 1473–74 (relying on expert testimony to identify the objective points of comparison among different computer software programs); Swirsky v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
S. 377, 389 (1992) ("[W]ords can in some circumstances violate laws directed not against speech but against conduct"). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
In People v Brown, 253 Mich 537; 235 NW 245 (1931), the Court noted that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulations, but stressed that such regulations “cannot constitutionally result in the prohibition of the possession of those arms which, by the common opinion and usage of law-abiding people, are proper and legitimate to be kept upon private premises for the [read post]