Search for: "People v. Buchanan" Results 1 - 20 of 237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Buchanan, as not to understand the tergiversations, the twistings, and the windings of John B. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
According to the Illinois Republican, there had been a conspiracy among four “workmen” of the Democratic Party to nationalize slavery in the United States, which had culminated in Dred Scott v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" I illustrated the idea in my essay last week on the oral argument in the Rahimi case:self-styled originalists who don't want to be seen as rejecting Brown v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
There is a temptation to classify these deceptive practices as just another byproduct of our iniquitous era of botox and breast implants, where packaging is valued above substance and identity represents not things as they are but as people can be made to believe them to be. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
Our column anticipated that hypocritical lawyers working for Trump would say that the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional, despite the Supreme Court's reliance on it in Bush v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm by NARF
FSST Management Services, LLC (Tribal Lending; Arbitration; Choice-of-Law Provision) Buchanan v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
If the prediction turns out to be true that June 1 is the drop-dead date, then June 2 would simply be the first day on which people could file suit to stop the President from doing what had previously been merely hypothetical. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest solo Verdict column (by contrast with the various debt-ceiling columns I've been co-authoring with Prof Buchanan) offers an animal-welfare-centric view of last week's SCOTUS decision in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am by Michael C. Dorf
A First Amendment challenge to the law made it to the Supreme Court itself, which, in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:24 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Buchanan Almost exactly a year ago, I wrote a column here on Dorf on Law that I described as a "mental health break. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:08 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  And although the one Supreme Court case to address the underpinnings of Amd14, 1935's Perry v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
If free speech is for people, and corporations aren't people, then is there an element of hypocrisy in supporting a lawsuit by a corporation asserting its right to use its wealth and power with respect to a contentious political issue? [read post]