Search for: "People v. Cherry" Results 41 - 60 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2013, 5:08 pm
” The Cherry Court emphasized that “the People have not articulated any argument whatsoever asserting good cause' for failing to comply with the time constraints of CPL 240.90(1). [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:32 am by Jack Bogdanski
But abortion was the big prize, the cherry on top of their sundae of repression, their wet dream of many decades. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
Under this model, if representative bodies did a good job of representing the people, the courts would be unnecessary. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last Tuesday, March 4, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Duran v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:56 am by Bill
So why do we believe that the sort of discrimination justified in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:23 pm by Steve Cornforth
My first ever venture into the Court of Appeal and the Law Reports was Rimmer v Liverpool City Council [1983] EWCA Civ 11. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
Whatever the medium, the ‘meaning’ must be taken from the publication as a whole, taking into account relevant context, rather than cherry-picked statements in isolation. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:05 am by SHG
– The California Supreme Court, People v. [read post]