Search for: "People v. Cobb" Results 21 - 40 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2015, 8:36 am
v=eqefgERZQXs Merlin and Queen Morgan's skills do not lie in their ability to prepare magic potions or control people, but in their capacity to make, unmake, use, interpret and reinterpret symbols – the sword that made Arthur become a King, the ritual which gave birth to Lancelot. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
"... but their motivations were more complex: if the efforts to upend Jim Crow reflected idealism, it was a cynical idealism," writes Jelani Cobb in a New Yorker article titled "The Failure of Desegregation." [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am by Orin Kerr
Steeves, 525 F.2d 33, 38 (8th Cir. 1975) (upholding a warrant on the basis that "people who own pistols generally keep them at home or on their persons"); United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:11 am by Hilf & Hilf, PLC
  The Judge is also allowed to consider protection of society as a reason to go higher than the recommended guideline range (see People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am by Jon Sands
Cobb, 532 U.S. 162 (2001); and Sattazahn v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:47 am by Maxwell Kennerly
They’ve been real heroes, great people to work with, and they put a lot of resources into this case. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:46 pm
On July 3rd the ILB posted an entry that began: "The 7th Circuit heard oral arguments in the case of Hindrichs v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:55 am by Jeanne Long
  In that case, the prosecutor and defendant negotiated a plea agreement that was not predicated upon a statement by the Court that it would sentence defendant to a specified term or within a specified range, see People v Cobbs, 443 Mich 276 (1993). [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Cobb House, 157 Hill Street, Athens, GAThursday, October 24, 20133:30-5:00  |  Keynote Address by Edward L. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner… [read post]