Search for: "People v. Cobb" Results 21 - 40 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2019, 10:11 am by Hilf & Hilf, PLC
  The Judge is also allowed to consider protection of society as a reason to go higher than the recommended guideline range (see People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 2:08 pm
  Just like people with Section 1983 constitutional claims don't get priority in bankruptcy. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:11 pm by Shane Peagler
On January 26, 2018, the Law Office of Michael Neff, P.C. agreed to settle the case of Woodard v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:11 pm by Shane Peagler
On January 26, 2018, the Law Office of Michael Neff, P.C. agreed to settle the case of Woodard v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:15 am by Joe Patrice
A lot of people aren't familiar with State of Oregon v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am by Orin Kerr
Steeves, 525 F.2d 33, 38 (8th Cir. 1975) (upholding a warrant on the basis that "people who own pistols generally keep them at home or on their persons"); United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Rule in Clibbery v Allan In a sense, the case of Clibbery v Allan [2002] EWCA Civ 45, [200] Fam 261, [2002] 2 WLR 1511, [2002] 1 FLR 565 confirms my point; and it represents the common – (judge-made) – law, which cannot be overturned by a rule-maker. [read post]
Cobb reads Friday’s events as an indication that Mueller is “moving with all deliberate speed and clears the way for a prompt and reasonable conclusion” of the investigation. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 2:04 pm by Giles Peaker
She also failed in a judicial review of RKBC’s newly restrictive planning policy on basement developments, and of course won in the House of Lords on proprietary estoppel, but lost on unjust enrichment in  Yeomans Row v Cobbe (2008) UKHL 55. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:02 am by INFORRM
Newly Published Cases for Explanation or Comment ZA Council v MT & Ors [2017] EWFC 12 (14 February 2017): An interesting example of extensive redaction  This is the published judgment of a decision by Moor J sitting as a High Court Judge in the Family Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
A judge has barred journalists from naming four people mounting a fresh High Court Brexit challenge in reports on the case. [read post]