Search for: "People v. Cooper"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2023, 8:45 am
R v de Freitas held that the Crown must prove more than the potential for endangerment and that the child was actually endangered. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm
A recent study found that 25-44 percent of pregnant people seeking an abortion in Alabama had to travel out of state, even before Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
Malone v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:15 am
This West Chester lawmaker invited her testimony, chair says,” Ohio Capital Journal (July 14, 2021). [2] The Disinformation Dozen (2021), [3] Shaw v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Technologists v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
AirdayEst. of Airday v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
People with felony convictions are not eligible to serve. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am
Read Part I for a quick snapshot of the ins and outs of the zero draft; Part II for a deep dive on Chapter IV dealing with domestic surveillance powers; and Part III for a deep dive on Chapter V regarding international cooperation: the historical context of international police cooperation mechanisms, the zero draft's approach, the scope of cooperation, and protection of personal data. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
This is the third segment in EFF’s series on the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention focusing on Chapter V, International Cooperation. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
This first post covers the historical context of international cooperation mechanisms, the zero draft's approach in Chapter V, the scope of cooperation, and protection of personal data. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
The animosity and struggles between Black and Frankfurter are well-documented by many fine scholars and historians but Sloan's telling of that difficult relationship is fresh and compelling.Perhaps the most surprising part of the book is how often the justices are seen cooperating with the President and his people. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:49 pm
’ In addition, the Commission concludes that there is nothing to suggest the trustees of Watch Tower Britain did anything other than cooperate with the inquiry. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In the 2012 decision United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
The Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case titled Habib Ullah Energy Limited and another v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
The second was to establish an annual Forum on Business and Human Rights " to discuss trends and challenges in the implementation of the Guiding Principles and promote dialogue and cooperation on issues linked to business and human rights" (A/HRC/RES/17/4, ¶12). [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 10:28 am
For an example of these problems, see U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
On Tuesday 18 July 2023 there was a hearing in the case of Coopers Fire Limited v Mcloughlin. [read post]