Search for: "People v. Cox (1978)"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2023, 2:32 pm
Superior Hosp., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:23 pm
, 802 So.2d 315, 315 (Fla. 2001)); see also Cox v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 7:30 am
He’s best known for Brown v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Cox Professor of Law, The George Washington University --Robert Cover, Legal Pluralism, and the Possibility of a Jurisgenerative Jurisprudence Avi Soifer. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm
" Cox Broad. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
Kinney v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:00 am
Ohio State Bar Ass'n, 436 U.S. 447, 456 (1978), citing a labor threat case, NLRB v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:21 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm
Judge O’Grady refused Cox’s request. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
As explained by the district court in Nader v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
One of the courses I enjoyed most was Archibald Cox’s course on the Supreme Court and the Constitution. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
The cohort was followed for a median of 6.6 years, in which time there were 154 cases of ovarian cancer, available for analysis using Cox’s proportional hazards model. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Berge v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:20 am
Union, Local 25 v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The Samaritans said “it was felt the column’s use of imagery and tone violated the dignity of people who had died by suicide and intruded into the grief of their families“. [read post]
