Search for: "People v. Davis (1994)"
Results 101 - 120
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Mass. 1993), aff'd, 39 F.3d 384 (1st Cir. 1994).Montana: Davis v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Pa. 1994); Veil v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10… [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
Pa. 1994). [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
The circuit court found that the Oklahoma court lacked personal jurisdiction over Frazee, but the Supreme Court of Missouri reversed in People’s Bank v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
Davis, 139 S. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:25 pm
The jury never saw the V-Plot video. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Inhofe has served in the Senate since 1994 and his current term runs until 2027. [read post]
21 Sep 2004, 11:36 pm
This issue is dealt with in Park Place Estates v. [read post]
