Search for: "People v. Dixon (1999)" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am by David Smith
Rochdale Borough Council v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173Apologies for the late delivery of this case note which has been held up by a blizzard (of work rather than the kind afflicting the Eastern USA).This case is somewhat complicated and involved so you will have to bear with me. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am by David Smith
Rochdale Borough Council v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173Apologies for the late delivery of this case note which has been held up by a blizzard (of work rather than the kind afflicting the Eastern USA).This case is somewhat complicated and involved so you will have to bear with me. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Pa. 1996) (dose below ten rems is insufficient to infer more likely than not the existence of a causal link), aff’d on other grounds, 193 F.3d 613, 629 (3d Cir. 1999) (rejecting “doubling dose” trial court’s analysis), amended, 199 F.3d 158 (3d Cir. 2000) In re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litig., 1998 WL 775340, at *8 (E.D.Wash. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]