Search for: "People v. Douglas (1969)" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
Georgia (1972) 408 U.S. 238, until rendered moot by the California Supreme Court decision in People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm by Carl Custer
Surgeoner, Benjamin Chapman, Randall Phebus and Douglas A. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
But there was nonetheless a majority, which was guided by an ideological core that (to borrow a phrase from Cass Sunstein's recent essay) had a vision - Brennan and Douglas (throughout); Clark (through 1967); Marshall (replacing Clark); Warren (through 1969); Fortas (1965-69); and Black (through 1971). [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Schachtman
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
When the National League announced in November 1967, that it would be adding two additional teams for the 1969 season, Milwaukee applied for one of the franchises, as did groups from Dallas-Ft. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Excerpt: from Chapter 1, Part VI Conclusion, Personal Reflection by Douglas Elliott, “In Praise of Lawyers”. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for a Pennsylvania man in the case of Elonis v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  The Court said that such punishment could only take place if there was a substantial nexus between the student speech and the school environment and the school officials could reasonably forecast that the speech would cause a substantial disruption of school activities within the meaning of the 1969 case of Tinker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
This led to an occupation of the site by members of the tribe, with 222 people eventually evicted by police after 506 days. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]