Search for: "People v. Garcia" Results 61 - 80 of 548
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
” Inforrm had an article on the new phenomenon of the “TikTok Tabloid,” which sets out how digital technologies are enabling a new form of social surveillance, and the impact this has on people’s private lives. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
Where the later starts from the premise that all sovereign power is vested in a government whose authority is ordered and constrained by a constitutional document, Chinese constitutional theory starts from the premise of the delegation of sovereign authority from the people to its leading forces constituted as a vanguard party. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:48 am by Richard Hunt
In Garcia v Dudum et al, 2021 WL 4975049, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Eastern District of California Garcia v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the Eastern District of California Garcia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
June 13) (suggesting that mentioning a felony coupled with "the omission to mention the reversal of the conviction" could be libelous); see also Garcia v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 1:19 pm by Silver Law Group
You can read the petition for Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 9:16 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Put more simply, the federal government does not have to fund health care services that make people sick. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court decision in 2013, and another this year, weakened the landmark law, while Republican-controlled Legislatures passed new voting restrictions advocates say target people of color, as well as young and working-class people. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:03 pm by Jennifer Koh
Breyer suggested that only a “handful” of people might be affected by a decision favoring Palomar-Santiago, a contention with which Garcia agreed. [read post]