Search for: "People v. Garcia (1991)" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2014, 9:51 am
Defendant violated parole and was returned to prison in 1991. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
Co. v Zuk, 78 NY2d 41 [1991]; People v Licitra, 47 NY2d 554 [1979]), absent any proof that the defendant had any medical training or knowledge of anatomy or physiology regarding the risks of a leg wound involving the femoral artery, and that such involvement could likely be fatal. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
McKines, 933 F.2d 1412 (8th Cir.1991); United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:19 pm by Steve Hall
" Doody was convicted of taking part in the murder of nine people, including six monks, whose bodies were found face down in a circle, each with a bullet to the head, in a Buddhist temple in Arizona in 1991. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Although Wickard has engendered opposition, it has in no sense proven "unworkable," see Garcia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Pacheco-Garcia v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply   Pacheco-Garcia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987 (1991), held, "[i]t is only reasonable therefore that as between the injured user and the one who places the product on the market the latter should bear the loss. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:48 am by Richard Hunt
In Garcia v Dudum et al, 2021 WL 4975049, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm by Mike
Garcia Marquez (9th Cir. 1991).She granted the motion to dismiss with prejudice. [read post]