Search for: "People v. Garcia (1996)"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
This post examines an opinion from the Appellate Court of Illinois – Fifth Division: People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
The Court revisited the issue last year in Panetti v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am
Morgan, 88 F.3d 620, 625-26 (8th Cir. 1996); Nilson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:15 pm
See People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:21 pm
I concluded by noting that the Fourth Department last cited Delgado as a basis for reducing a negotiated sentence in 1996 in People v Sanchez (225 AD2d 1085 [4th Dept 1996]), in which the Court reduced a negotiated sentence from 8 1/3 year to life to 3 years to life. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:52 am
Garcia, 20 NY3d 317 [2012]). [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Herrera-Garcia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 658 N.W.2d 127 (Mich. 2003)) or the Sixth Circuit (Garcia v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
See Mota v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
White, 627 F.2d 637, 649 (3d Cir. 1980); Garcia v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
In 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Stanford Law School Immigrants’ Rights Clinic, and the law firm Sidley Austin challenged the practice of prolonged detention in two class action cases—Garcia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 3:44 pm
" People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm
On Friday 20 June 2014 Bean J heard the PTR in the case of Garcia v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
Div., 122 N.M. 173, 922 P.2d 555 (1996) (`”Substantial evidence” is evidence that a reasonable mind would regard as adequate to support a conclusion. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Garcia, the statute of limitations apply with equal force to section 1983 method-of-execution action; 2) the limitations period begins to accrue on the date direct review of a plaintiff's conviction and sentence is complete; 3) the district court correctly found that the statute of limitations has run for each of the three remaining plaintiffs; and 4) there was no reason to hold that the statute of limitations has been tolled. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 7:38 am
(citing People v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
One swarm may last for months up to well over a year, depending on the popularity of the work, and people may leave and re-enter the same swarm at any time. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Pacheco-Garcia v. [read post]
