Search for: "People v. Grant (1969)" Results 21 - 40 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Background Few people would demur from Parliament’s acknowledgement of the vital importance of education. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:56 am
It also seems to stand in contrast to the apparently more tepid attitude towards the grant of stays exhibited the High Court in Akai Pty Ltd v People's Insurance Co. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am by MATHEW PURCHASE, MATRIX
Background Few people would demur from Parliament’s acknowledgement of the vital importance of education. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am by Bernard Bell
FCC, 395 U.S. 367, 389-90 (1969).[2] Section 317 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
Wouter Vandenhole; and Jingjing Zhang Pursuant to the Section Registrar’s notification dated 25 March 2021 that the President of the Chamber (Fourth Section) had granted permission under Rule 44 § 5 of the Rules of the European Court of Human Rights   Duarte Agostinho and others v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Maine People's Alliance -- scope of citizens' rights to force a cleanup of hazardous wastes. 06-1543, Saouvong v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
      In setting aside the Roadless Rule, the district court held that the rule violated the Wilderness Act of 1964 (Wilderness Act), and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:01 pm by Elijah Yip
Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), or Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 8:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
To support this purposive interpretation, the majority cited a 1969 document by The Right Honourable P. [read post]