Search for: "People v. Greenfield (1982)" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 Where the motion papers demonstrate that the defendant’s right to testify before the grand jury has not been “scrupulously protected,” the “mandatory language” of CPL § 190.50(5) “creates what is a ministerial duty on the part of the court to dismiss an indictment obtained in violation of a defendant’s right to appear before the Grand Jury” (Matter of Borrello v Balbach, 112 AD2d 1051 [2nd Dept 1985]; see also, People… [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:27 am
Greenfield, 134 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 (California Court of Appeals 1982)), meaning a violation may be proved by showing [Shivers] knew of the contents of the [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The MOU superseded contrary provisions in the 1982-1985 CBA between CSEA and the State. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The MOU superseded contrary provisions in the 1982-1985 CBA between CSEA and the State. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Supp. 863, 867 (D.N.J. 1982), aff'd without opinion, 729 F.2d 1445 (3rd Cir. 1984). [read post]