Search for: "People v. Hale"
Results 61 - 80
of 374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:42 am
Branham v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:10 am
"So begins a somewhat hysterical piece by Melanie Phillips in the Daily Mail today referring, of course, to Lady Hale's comments in the Scottish case of Gow v Grant.How could Lady Hale's very reasonable view that English and Welsh cohabitants and their children should have the benefit of the same protection that their Scottish counterparts have give rise to such a venomous response? [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The appellant was named and the case name is now Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
The reason the school owes Pupil C a non-delegable duty of care, according to Lady Hale, is because it has undertaken to teach her: “[T]hat responsibility is not discharged simply by choosing apparently competent people to do it. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
The reason the school owes Pupil C a non-delegable duty of care, according to Lady Hale, is because it has undertaken to teach her: “[T]hat responsibility is not discharged simply by choosing apparently competent people to do it. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
Background The Supreme Court has upheld a challenge to the “named person” provisions of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
The fact that Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
The second is that the names of the people whose cases are being decided, and others involved in the hearing, should be public knowledge. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:22 am
Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]
16 May 2008, 10:59 am
(Troensegaard, supra, at p. 228, 220 Cal.Rptr. 712; see Hale v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am
The two key cases are Province of Bombay v Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay [1947] AC 58 and Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council [1990] 2 AC 580. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:42 pm
In a February 9, 2011 post I discussed the case of Too Much Media LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
Doyle v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm
The Court did not accept the claimant’s arguments that these passages of Lord Hope and Lady Hale in Birmingham v Ali did not apply to the grant of mandatory relief, or that they were limited to situations where suitability was disputed. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:33 am
Under the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970, s 2(1) disabled people have a right to practical assistance from their local authority to meet their needs. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
People, 96 Illinois, 96; People v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
So let's hear all of our DeSantis judges make a speech today against Gideon v. [read post]
