Search for: "People v. Hale (1999)" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Cramer, Concealed Weapon Laws of Early Republic: Dueling, Southern Violence, and Moral Reform (1999), plus the Appendix to Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh's Fourth Circuit supplemental brief in Bianchi v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  The Guardian reported that “Sunday People ‘hired detectives to target Milly Dowler phone” whereas Bloomberg went for the Royal angle with a piece entitled “Prince Harry Seeks Investigator Receipts in Phone Hacking Case“. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The leading judgment for the majority was given by Lord Sumption, with a concurring judgment delivered by Lady Hale. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by ASAD KHAN
At the end of the hearing, perturbed by the respondents’ tough predicament, Lady Hale characterised these proceedings as an “anxious case”. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am by MATHEW PURCHASE, MATRIX
Background Few people would demur from Parliament’s acknowledgement of the vital importance of education. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The decisions to segregate the prisoners were made under the Prison Act 1952, rule 45 of the Prison Rules 1999 and PSO 1700. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:31 am by SJM
The ECtHR Chamber has delivered its decision in McDonald v UK. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Pa. 1996) (dose below ten rems is insufficient to infer more likely than not the existence of a causal link), aff’d on other grounds, 193 F.3d 613, 629 (3d Cir. 1999) (rejecting “doubling dose” trial court’s analysis), amended, 199 F.3d 158 (3d Cir. 2000) In re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litig., 1998 WL 775340, at *8 (E.D.Wash. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:36 am by Sean Gallagher
In 1999, according to New Zealand’s Investigate magazine (PDF), he was spotted at the airport in Munich getting his picture taken inside parked airplanes, which he then used to suggest that he owned them. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am by Matthew Flinn
If that were true, the prosecution of E could send the wrong message to other young people being similarly exploited. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]