Search for: "People v. Harris (1994)"
Results 81 - 100
of 163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
The title of the proposed amendment goes even farther, claiming that it would “Restore Democracy to the American People. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:55 pm
Here's how United Sates Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun put it in staying an injunction that a lower court had imposed forbidding CBS from running undercover footage of a beef processing plant in CBS, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:15 am
Despite all of this, including the Supreme Court declaration in Harris v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 6:23 pm
The Factual Background of The Case In 1994, the defendant pleaded guilty in Harris County, Texas, to the crime indecency with a child by exposure, Tex. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
Meanwhile, others abuse the system to receive free money[v] that is administered by one of the most wasteful and ineffective bodies—the American government—which charges a massive administration fee. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am
(Baccash v Sayegh, 53 AD3d at 639 [quoting Harris v Stony Clove Lake Acres, 202 AD2d 745, 747 (3d Dept 1994)].) [*5] The caselaw cited above appears to consider the issue in terms of both "standing to sue" (New Castle Siding Co., Inc. v Wolfson, 97 AD2d at 502) and "having a cause of action" (id.) . [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:45 am
Justice Blackmun wrote those words in February 1994 in a Texas death penalty case, Callins v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
