Search for: "People v. Heath"
Results 121 - 140
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Francis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
Here’s Why That Won’t Happen.Center for Public Integrity – Sarah Kleiner | Published: 8/31/2017 Seizing on the specter of Russian election influence, Democrats have ramped up their quixotic effort to blunt Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
The government's explanation for this exemption is, in effect, that because such employers typically can and do prefer to hire employees who are coreligionists who can be assumed to share the churches' religious commitments, such employees are less likely to wish to purchase birth control: "[H]ouses of worship and their integrated auxiliaries that object to contraceptive coverage on religious grounds are more likely than other employers to employ people of the same faith… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
They have suggested, however, that the law must have a very different practical effect than I surmised because, if I were correct, then most employers would be dropping their health insurance plans—something that is not happening and that the government does not expect to happen anytime soon.My correspondents are of course correct about their factual premise: Some large employers will drop their employee heath insurance plans in response to the ACA, but most will not. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
The House of Commons exists because the people have elected its members. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
In Boerne v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 7:25 am
ZTE and Conversant v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
Oh, my goodness, some — some people thought that he was criminally irresponsible, and others thought he was a genius. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
In Eldridge v British Columbia, the Court found that the failure of hospitals to provide sign-language services for hearing-impaired patients was a violation of section 15. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
That’s what Heath Haussamen, editor and publisher of NMPolitics.net, did after the New Mexico Spaceport Authority in 2017 refused to hand over basic public records related to the private companies that lease real estate at Spaceport America, the much-publicized commercial launchpad just outside Truth or Consequences, N.M. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
That’s what Heath Haussamen, editor and publisher of NMPolitics.net, did after the New Mexico Spaceport Authority in 2017 refused to hand over basic public records related to the private companies that lease real estate at Spaceport America, the much-publicized commercial launchpad just outside Truth or Consequences, N.M. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:17 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:18 pm
If nothing else, it was another great lesson in the power of the internet to parse questions like this and provide direct access to people who opine on things and even occasionally to come to some comfortable place of disagreement.It all started when I saw the letter. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:34 pm
This is affecting one of the most important industries in our society, heath care. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:19 am
Nahal Toosi and Ryan Heath report for POLITICO. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm
Responsible parties should begin preparing to take advantage of the anticipated legislative and regulatory relief both by both carefully monitoring statutory and regulatory health plan developments and positioning themselves to act quickly when relief comes by evaluating their existing heath plan documents, contracts, communications and systems to verify existing compliance and determine requirements for implementing any planned changes, opening up discussion vendors about these… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]
