Search for: "People v. Hirst"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 8:00 am
In Hirst v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:31 pm
In Hirst v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:33 pm
Italy (22 May 2012) has diluted the right to vote for prisoners that it upheld in Hirst v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:25 pm
IN, CASE OF GREENS and M.T. v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:31 am
“There has been some discussion on the UK Human Rights Blog about the judgments in the Hirst v UK/Scoppula v Italy cases, the latest of which was given this week. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
Lothian and Borders Police probed allegations made by Mr Hirst in September but said they would take no further action.A spokeswoman for Ms Grahame said: “Mr Hirst’s comments have absolutely no credibility and Ms Grahame will not respond to such ridiculous claims. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 1:39 pm
Monitoring the Government's Response to Human Rights Judgments: Annual Report 2008"Prisoners' voting rights (Hirst v UK)47. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 8:58 am
In Hirst v UK(No2), the Prisoners Votes Case, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that denying prisoners the vote breached their human rights under Article 3 of the First Protocol of the European Convention.Lawyers acting for the prisoners seek to rely upon a US Supreme Court ruling which decided that the loss of the vote can result in an award of monetary damages by way of compensation. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:17 am
The FCO also referred to another prisoner voting case, Frodl v Austria (see my post), which “in the Government’s view, is inconsistent with Hirst”. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm
In particular, this Court had had occasion to consider Hirst in the recent cases of Calmanovici v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:03 am
CASE OF SCOPPOLA v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 5:45 pm
Hirst Applegate, my friend Dale Cottam’s firm in Cheyenne, Wyoming is the other one). [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 12:25 am
Four years ago, the European Court of Human Rights criticised the policy in Hirst v UK, which arose out of the 2002 case of R v Home Secretary ex parte Hirst. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 3:43 am
The group are seeking to remind the Government of the four year old judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Hirst v UK, which arose out of the 2002 case of R v Home Secretary ex parte Hirst. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
They argued that, following the Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) judgment (among other things), the ERO was obliged to add their names to the electoral register. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 7:16 am
Lehmann describes the dubious reasoning behind the court’s 1886 fiat, in Santa Clara County v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
The proper construction of s 1(1) The background to this issue, and to the enactment of s 1(1), is the judgment in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414, in which Tugendhat J considered that there was a “threshold of seriousness” recognised under common law, and in which he favoured a definition that a statement was defamatory if it “… substantially affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards [the… [read post]
