Search for: "People v. Huff (1983)"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2016, 12:30 pm
It also determined that the sheriff was not required to allow her a two-year convalescence period following reemployment before terminating her employment (Huff v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
Huff, both civil cases brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 29, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
