Search for: "People v. Ines" Results 141 - 160 of 1,442
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2008, 8:17 am
However, the case cited by defendant does not represent a change in the decisional law as it was decided prior to the appellate decision in this case and relied upon other decisions of both the Appellate Division and the Appellate Term of the 9th and 10th Judicial Districts standing for the same proposition (see, People v Lewis, 16 3d 173 [1 Dept. 2005]; Patil v Country-Wide Ins. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:47 pm
As I note in the column, ludicrous as this sounds, it's the position staked out by Justice Scalia (for himself, Rehnquist and Thomas) in INS v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:02 am
There are actually a surprising number of exceptions to that rule . . . but the amended judgment in People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:41 am by Darius Whelan
  This is an issue which arises in residential settings such as nursing homes, social care institutions and centres for people with disabilities. [read post]