Search for: "People v. Ingram" Results 41 - 57 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2011, 11:36 pm by TDot
Since TYLA teams are either 2 or 3 people, in our case we’ve got 1 person solely doing prosecution, 1 solely doing defense, and the “swing” (me) doing both So there have been multi-hour practices 4-5 days a week for a month now. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
See Jeff Jarvis here; Mathew Ingram here. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 5:51 am
Ingram Micro, Inc., 2000 WL 726789 (U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
This confused many people because Section 230 has nothing to do with the military, and a veto screwed the military. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:57 pm by Darren
The case of Adcock Ingram v Cipla Medpro reconsidered the notion that pharmaceuticals sold on prescription are less likely to be confused because they are dispensed by trained professionals in regulated circumstances. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:25 pm by Leslie Sammis
The misdemeanor criminal court in Bushnell, Sumter County, FL, accepts the plea and does the following:Adjudicates the individual guilty of the offense (so they will never be eligible to seal or expunge any criminal record, including the most recent arrest);Sentences the person to 59 days in the Sumter County jail (which is the maximum sentence allowed by law for a second degree misdemeanor);The court announces that it will "suspend" the jail sentence; The court also announces… [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
New on the podcast: Black Lives Matter, a qualified immunity cert petition (Kelsay v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:40 am by Michael Oykhman
Use A key consideration when establishing “use” of a credit card is established in a case called R v Tuduce, 2014 ONCA 547 (CanLII). [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]