Search for: "People v. John (1983)" Results 221 - 240 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Lombardi, the en banc court held that the district court erred by dismissing the inmate’s Section 1983 method-of-execution claim sua sponte and without holding a hearing. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
W.C.A.B. (1983) 33 Cal. 3d 585, to find the employer liable even though the violent incident, which resulted in applicant’s death, occurred on a public street after applicant finished work. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:29 am by Eugene Volokh
A few days later, the TTABlog, written by trademark lawyer John L. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:48 pm
Huffman and Justice Cynthia Aaron joined McDonald in his opinion.The case is People v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:08 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here's an overview of the settlement provisions from the report's summary: The 1983 settlement agreement that ended litigation in Morales v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
A few days later, the TTABlog, written by trademark lawyer John L. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
Parliament had already decided the matter with the Representation of the People Act 1983. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  In some sense, this was also the great year of Jew baiting--everyone, it seems, had something to say about the People of Israel, even as their actions usually belied their words. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  Once general principles of institutional structures are understood, it is possible to contextualize these insights within the realities of the American Republic--the general government, the administrative branches, inferior political units, and the residuary role of the people as ultimate sovereigns. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Daily Journal (subscription required), David Boyle looks at National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. v. [read post]