Search for: "People v. Jones (1982)" Results 61 - 80 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am by Katherine Gallo
Superior Court (1984) 161 CA 3d 151, 167-168 (pdf), family members Jones v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by DaytonDUI
  The people charged with protecting us are failing! [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
This led to an occupation of the site by members of the tribe, with 222 people eventually evicted by police after 506 days. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:42 am by Justin P. Webb
Edmonson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922, 937 (1982); United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:38 am
There is the famous Exxon case, Exxon Corp. v. [read post]
Eleven years later, the Court decided a case in which the reason for the racial discrimination was religious in Bob Jones University v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Sasha Volokh
Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 712–13 (1997) (Breyer, J., dissenting))) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Tex. 1982) (“From the relative risk, we can calculate the probability that a given case of GBS was caused by vaccination. . . . [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]