Search for: "People v. Jones (1989)" Results 121 - 140 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Eleven years later, the Court decided a case in which the reason for the racial discrimination was religious in Bob Jones University v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by DaytonDUI
  The people charged with protecting us are failing! [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
This led to an occupation of the site by members of the tribe, with 222 people eventually evicted by police after 506 days. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
See White Collar Crime: Fifth Survey of Law-Immunity, 26 Am.Crim.L.Rev. 1169, 1179 & n. 62 (1989) (hereafter “Immunity”). [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
Or are they representing and serving a class of people not reflecting the diversity of the public? [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[7]  Judges charged with making these custody decisions “rarely received the expert testimony of native people who could familiarize [them] with traditional child-rearing practices,” but instead relied upon the testimony of non-Indian social workers who were ignorant of the ways and traditions of Native Americans.[8]  These social workers often advised courts that the abject poverty of many Indian families prevented them from properly parenting their… [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Marty Lederman
Hopkins (1989), in which the plaintiff, Ann Hopkins, alleged that an accounting firm unlawfully discriminated against her when it refused to offer her a partnership. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm by Pace Law School Library
Town of Wells, 557 A.2d 168, 1989.) 16 Ocean & Coastal L.J. 481-537 (2011).McQueeney, Megan. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Med. 997 (1989); Troyen A. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]